||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 236 (Jan)
|| EWHC 113 (Comm)
||Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
||Roger Masefield QC and Joanna Box (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the claimant.
||Tom Weisselberg (instructed by Mishcon de Reya LLP) for the defendants.
||31 January 2014
Damages - Apportionment - Enquiry as to damages - Proceedings concerning dispute between parties as to ownership of Indian companies - English court granting injunction - Claimant giving cross-undertaking in damages in support of injunction - Defendants making order for inquiry as to damages allegedly suffered as result of injunction - Whether order for inquiry to be made.
Damages Apportionment. In the course of a dispute about the ownership of certain Indian companies, the defendants applied for an order for an inquiry as to damages under a cross-undertaking in damages given by the claimant in support of an injunction made by the English court. The Commercial Court held that, on the evidence, the claimant had not succeeded in showing that the loss allegedly suffered by the defendants had not been caused by the injunction, and therefore the application would be allowed and an inquiry would be ordered.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases