||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 312 (May)
|| EWCA Civ 579
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Lloyd, Patten and Black LJJ
||Christopher Baker (instructed by Anthony Collins Solicitors LLP) for Optima.
||Nathalie Lieven QC and Sally Blackmore (instructed by Shelter West Midlands Housing Advice Service) for the defendant.
||24 May 2013
Landlord and Tenant - Tenancy agreement - Possession - Flexibuy scheme - Claiamnt operating 'Flexibuy' scheme - Defendant renting property with option to buy from claimant housing association (Optima), pursuant to a shorthold tenancy and option agreement - Defendant falling into arrears - Claimant obtaining order for possession - Defendant appealing - Whether defendant entitled to repayment of deposit portion of rent - Whether rent paid under terms of tenancy being contribution to deposit payable on exercise by her of option.
Landlord and Tenant Tenancy agreement. The issue on appeal was whether 700, paid by the defendant as rent, although reserved as rent as part of the claimant's Flexibuy scheme, was in fact intended to be a composite payment with a substantial deposit element. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the claimant's appeal, held that there was nothing in the option to buy agreement which gave the tenant a proprietary claim to the deposit incentive.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases