||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 59 (Jul)
|| EWHC 1859 (TCC)
||Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
Mr Justice Akenhead
||Tom Leech QC and Adam Smith (instructed by Eversheds LLP) appeared on behalf of the claimants.
||Anneliese Day QC and Michael Ryan (instructed by Weightmans LLP) for the defendant.
||24 June 2013
Costs - Order for costs - Indemnity costs - Claimants claim alleging professional negligence against defendant being dismissed - Appropriate order for costs - Whether defendant entitled to indemnity costs.
Costs Order for costs. In earlier proceedings, the claimants' case alleging professional negligence against the defendant was dismissed. The Chancery Division held that, on the facts, it was an appropriate case in which to make an order for indemnity costs in favour of the defendant.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases