Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2013] All ER (D) 276 (Jun)
Neutral Citation: [2013] EWHC 1790 (TCC)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
Judge:

Mr Justice Akenhead

Representation Simon Hughes QC (instructed by DAC Beachcroft LLP) for the claimant.
  Fiona Sinclair QC (instructed by Clyde & Co LLP) for the defendant.
  Mark Cannon QC (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the third party.
  Benjamin Pilling (instructed by Beale & Co LLP) for the fourth party.
Judgment Dates: 27 June 2013

Catchwords

Particulars of claim - Amendment - New course of action - Claim relating to alleged defective premises - Court of Appeal refusing claimant's application to amend particular elements of particulars of claim - Claimant seeking to make additional amendments - Whether additional amendments to be allowed.

The Case

Particulars of claim Amendment. In the course of proceedings concerning allegedly defective premises, the claimant sought to introduce re-amended particulars of claim. The Technology and Construction court considered proposed amendments to the claim, and held that the permission to amend would be granted.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.