||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 60 (Jul)
|| EWCA Civ 785
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Lord Dyson MR, Lord Justice Aikens and Lord Justice Elias
||Jonathan Adkin (instructed by Alfred James & Co Solicitors LLP, South Croydon) for the claimant.
||Guy Philipps QC (instructed by Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP) for the defendant.
||2 July 2013
Practice - Service out of jurisdiction - Claimant applying for permission to re-amend amended claim form and particulars of claim and to serve out of jurisdiction - Application being granted in part - Claimant appealing - Whether serious issue to be tried - Whether England clearly or distinctly appropriate forum.
Practice Service out of jurisdiction. The claimant had sought permission to amend his particulars of claim and to serve them out of the jurisdiction on the defendant bank. Of the three amendments that he had sought to make, two were refused and the third was allowed in part. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, allowed his appeal in part. The third amendment would be allowed in its entirety and permission to serve out of the jurisdiction was granted. The two other amendments were not allowed as there was no serious issue to be tried.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases