||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 229 (Apr)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Laws, Lewison and McCombe LJJ (judgment delivered extempore)
||Jonathan Wright (instructed by McManuss Seddon Runhams, Bradford) for the claimants.
||Ian Pennock (instructed by Stachiw Bashir Green, Bradford) for the defendant.
||26 April 2013
Easement - Right of way - Disturbance - Claimants issuing proceedings claiming interference with right of way over disputed land - Defendant submitting disputed land acquired by local authority as highway - Judge finding no evidence to support contention of disputed land being highway - Defendant appealing - Whether judge erring.
Easement Right of way. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that a judge had been entitled to find that the claimants had established an interference with their right of way over a disputed parcel of land. The defendant had failed to adduce any evidence to support her contention that the land had been acquired by the local authority as a highway at public expense.
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases