||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 138 (Apr)
|| EWCA Civ 228
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Pill, Davis LLJ and Warren J
||Justine Thornton and Zack Simons (instructed by Richard Buxton, Cambridge) for the appellant.
||John Hobson QC and Ned Helme (instructed by Breckland District Council) for the authority.
||Alex Goodman (instructed by Metcalfe Copeman and Pettefar) for the interested party.
||19 April 2013
Town and Country Planning - Planning permission - Judicial review of grant of planning permission - Defendant local authority granting interested party planning permission - Claiamnt applying for judicial review - Claimant appealing - Whether judge erring - Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999,
Town and Country Planning Planning permission. The defendant local authority granted the interested party two planning permissions for a biomass renewable energy plant and a combined heat and power plant. The claimant applied for judicial review on the basis that a further screening opinion under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales) Regulations 1999, should have been carried out. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division dismissed the claimant's appeal against the judge's decision to dismiss her application. There was no reason to interfere with the judge's findings, which had been properly open to him in the circumstances of the instant case.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases