| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 145 (May) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWCA Civ 638 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Lord Neuberger MR, Moore-Bick and Hallett LJJ |
| Representation | Michael Crane QC, Stephen Houseman and Damien Walker (instructed by Clyde & Co LLP) for the claimants. |
| David Wolfson QC and Nehali Shah (instructed by White & Case LLP) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 16 May 2012 |
Catchwords
Arbitration - Arbitration clause - 'Seat' of arbitration - Insurance policies containing London arbitration clause and Brazilian exclusive jurisdiction clause - Claimants giving notice of arbitration - Defendants issuing proceedings in Brazil seeking to establish claimants not entitled to refer to arbitration - Claimants obtaining anti-suit injunction restraining Brazilian proceedings - Judge finding proper law of arbitration agreement being English law - Defendants submitting parties impliedly choosing Brazilian law as governing arbitration agreement - Whether judge erring.
The Case
Arbitration Arbitration clause. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, upheld a decision that the proper law of an arbitration agreement contained in insurance policies between the parties had been English law, notwithstanding the express choice of Brazilian law as the law governing the policies and the connection of the policies to Brazil
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

