| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 130 (May) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWCA Crim 995 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Hughes LJ, Cooke and Burnett JJ |
| Representation | Henry Grunwald QC and Jason Cross (instructed by First Defence Solicitors) for the defendants. |
| John McGuinness QC and Jonathan Sank (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 16 May 2012 |
Catchwords
Public order - Football - Football banning order - Court imposing six year football banning orders (orders) following defendants' convictions for affray - Whether statutory process being followed - Whether orders should be quashed.
The Case
Public order Football. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, in allowing the defendants' appeals against football banning orders (FBOs), held, inter alia, that the statutory process for considering, and if appropriate, for making FBOs had not been followed.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
