||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 160 (May)
|| EWHC 1198 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
||Alan Masters (instructed by Davies Gore Lomax LLP) for the first claimant.
||Michael Rudd (instructed by Bramwell Browne Odedra Solicitors) for the second claimant.
||James Maurici (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
||8 May 2012
Town and country planning - Appeal to Minister against refusal of permission for development - Notification of decision - Appeal against decision - Whether Secretary of State erred in procedure making decision - Whether Secretary of State erred in substantive decision - and - Town and Country Planning (Inquiries Procedure) (England) Rules 2000 () paras 17(5) and 20.
Town and country planning Appeal to Minister against refusal of permission for development. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the claimants' application, held that the Secretary of State had not acted unlawfully in refusing to refer back the claimants' planning appeals for further representations following the re-establishment of Regional Spatial Strategies.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases