||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 09 (Jun)
|| EWHC 1376 (TCC)
||Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court
||James Bowling (instructed by Mills & Co solicitors) for the claimant.
||Ruth Wilkinson (instructed by Dundas & Wilson LLP) for the defendant.
||28 May 2012
Practice - Stay of proceedings - Arbitration - Claim arising regarding packages of construction work including main package and vacuum package - Issue arising as to whether main package and/or vacuum package carried out under a sub-contract containing arbitration clause - Defendant applying for stay of proceedings - Whether appropriate for stay to be granted - CPR 62.3(2).
Practice Stay of proceedings. The Technology and Construction Court of the Queen's Bench Division held that the defendant company's application to stay proceedings would succeed in part, in a dispute concerning the existence or otherwise of an arbitration clause.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases