| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 09 (Jun) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 1376 (TCC) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court |
| Judge: | Edwards-Stuart J |
| Representation | James Bowling (instructed by Mills & Co solicitors) for the claimant. |
| Ruth Wilkinson (instructed by Dundas & Wilson LLP) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 28 May 2012 |
Catchwords
Practice - Stay of proceedings - Arbitration - Claim arising regarding packages of construction work including main package and vacuum package - Issue arising as to whether main package and/or vacuum package carried out under a sub-contract containing arbitration clause - Defendant applying for stay of proceedings - Whether appropriate for stay to be granted - CPR 62.3(2).
The Case
Practice Stay of proceedings. The Technology and Construction Court of the Queen's Bench Division held that the defendant company's application to stay proceedings would succeed in part, in a dispute concerning the existence or otherwise of an arbitration clause.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
