||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 47 (May)
|| EWCA Civ 594
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Lord Neuberger MR, Longmore and Lewison LJJ
||Stephen Jourdan QC (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the claimant.
||Philip Rainey QC (instructed by Pemberton Greenish LLP) for the defendants.
||4 May 2012
Landlord and tenant - Leasehold enfranchisement - House - House reasonably so called - Building owned by defendant landlord comprising self-contained flats and retail units - Claimant tenant alleging entitlement to acquire freehold of property - Judge finding building not being house 'reasonably so called' - Whether judge erring - .
Landlord and tenant Leasehold enfranchisement. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the claimant's appeal, holding that the defendants' property, which comprised flats and retail units, was not 'a house' for the purpose of s2(1) of the .
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases