| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 169 (May) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 1188 (QB) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judge: | Judge Mackie QC sitting as a judge of the High Court |
| Representation | Fergus Randolph QC (instructed by Radcliffes Le Brasseur) for the claimant. |
| Matthew Parker (instructed by DLA Piper) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 15 May 2012 |
Catchwords
Conflict of laws - Jurisdiction - Challenge to jurisdiction - Defendant terminating agency of claimant - Claimant seeking compensation and contending that English law governing agency agreement - Defendant contending Spanish law governing agency agreement - Whether agency agreement governed by Spanish or English law - Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations 1980, arts 3,4.
The Case
Conflict of laws Jurisdiction. The Queen's Bench Division held that the applicable law of the commercial agency agreement between the parties was Spanish, not English law applying arts 3 and 4 of the Convention on the Law Applicable to Contractual Obligations 1980.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

