||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 94 (May)
|| EWCA Civ 596
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Maurice Kay, Rimer and Tomlinson LJJ
||Nicholas Dowding QC and Mark Sefton (instructed by DLA Piper UK LLP) for the claimant.
||Christopher Nugee QC and David Holland QC (instructed by Eversheds LLP) for the defendant.
||10 May 2012
Landlord and tenant - Lease - Option to renew - Defendant opposing grant of new tenancy to claimant company on basis of intention to occupy premises - Claimant commencing proceedings against defendant seeking grant of new tenancies - Judge finding defendant intending to occupy holdings for purposes, or partly for the purposes, of business to be carried on by it therein - Whether judge erring - .
Landlord and tenant Lease. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, upheld a finding that the defendant landlord had established a genuine intention to re-occupy premises leased to the claimant upon the expiry of the claimant's leases, and had accordingly defeated the claim for the grant of a new tenancy.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases