| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 211 (May) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Sir Andrew Morritt C (judgment delivered extempore) |
| Judgment Dates: | 25 May 2012 |
Catchwords
Judgment - Default judgement - Setting aside judgment - Default of defence - Default judgment being entered against defendant for, inter alia, breach of directors duties and failure to account for VAT - Defendant seeking to set aside default judgment on basis computer records withheld, draft defence being sufficient and being entitled to deny serious allegations of fraud on oath - Whether some other reason to set aside default judgment - CPR 13.3(1)(b).
The Case
Judgment Default judgement. The Chancery Division refused to set aside default judgment entered against the defendant on the basis that there was no real prospect of successfully defending the claims against him, even with access to computer documents and an accounting program sought and an extension of time.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

