| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 116 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWCA Civ 263 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Sir Andrew Morritt C, Patten and Pitchford LJJ |
| Representation | Richard Copnall (instructed by Russell Jones & Walker) for the claimant. |
| Graham Wells (instructed by DWF Solicitors) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 8 March 2012 |
Catchwords
Health and safety at work - Employer's duties - Claimant gamekeeper being employed by defendant trust - Defendant instructing claimant in firearm safety - Defendant instructing claimant to remove cartridges from shotgun when crossing obstacles - Claimant, working alone, falling over obstacle and shooting himself - Claimant issuing proceedings contending defendant in breach of relevant regulations - Judge dismissing claim - Claimant appealing - Whether judge erring - Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, .
The Case
Health and safety at work Employer's duties. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that the defendant employer was not in breach of the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 , where it had issued instructions requiring the claimant gamekeeper to remove cartridges from his shotgun when crossing obstacles, and where the claimant had ignored those instructions while working alone, so that he shot himself when he fell over a wall.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

