| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 130 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWCA Crim 501 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Criminal Division |
| Judge: | Aikens LJ, Field J and Judge Cooke QC |
| Representation | Anthony Montgomery (instructed by Morgan Rose Solicitors) for the defendant. |
| Siward James-Moore (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 15 March 2012 |
Catchwords
Criminal Evidence - Hearsay - Admissibility of hearsay evidence - Defendant convicted of unlawful wounding following incident in nightclub - Witness giving police statement only few hours after incident identifying defendant as person throwing glass bottle causing wound to complainant - At trial, witness confirming could only rely on statement and no longer having any memory of some aspects of incident - Judge ruling evidence in statement admissible and confirming would direct jury to treat evidence carefully - Whether statement admissible - Whether conviction unsafe - , , , , .
The Case
Criminal Evidence Hearsay. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, having considered and of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, held, in dismissing the defendant's appeal against conviction in respect of unlawful wounding, that not all of a witness statement should have been before the jury. However, the jury had not heard any inadmissible evidence of importance and the conviction was safe.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

