||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 23 (Apr)
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Pill, Hallett and Patten LJJ (judgment delivered extempore)
||Tom Coghlin and Sheryn Omeri (instructed by Leigh Day and Co) for the employee.
||Michael Paulin (instructed by Lyons Davidson Ltd) for the employer.
||30 March 2012
Employment - Discrimination - Discrimination on grounds of age - Employee claiming employer discriminated on grounds of age by replacing him with an employee with less post qualification experience - Employer appealing against a decision refusing to strike out claim - Whether Employment Appeal Tribunal erring in allowing claim to proceed.
Employment Discrimination. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, upheld a decision refusing to strike out a claim of age discrimination as the issue of whether an individual's post qualification experience and qualifications would give rise to a claim of age discrimination had required fuller consideration to justify refusal of a strike out application.
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases