| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 52 (Apr) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 773 (QB) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judge: | Tugendhat J |
| Representation | Paul Downes QC and Steven Reed (instructed by Wragge & Co) for the claimant. |
| Hugh Tomlinson QC (instructed by Clintons) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 29 March 2012 |
Catchwords
Practice - Striking out - Abuse of process - Claimant bringing claim for slander and claim for injunction - Defendant applying for claim to be struck out as abuse of process - Whether real and substantial prospect of trial court granting injunction.
The Case
Practice Striking out. The Queen's Bench Division, in declining an application to strike out a claim as an abuse of process, held that there had been a real and substantial prospect of a trial court granting a final injunction.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
