||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 93 (Mar)
|| EWHC 431 (QB)
||Queen's Bench Division
||Hugh Tomlinson QC (instructed by Schillings) for the claimant.
||Richard Spearman QC & Jacob Dean (instructed by Simons Muirhead & Burton) for the first defendant.
||The second defendant did not appear and was not represented.
||2 March 2012
Practice - Civil Procedure Rules - Striking out - Claimant bringing claim for damages and permanent non-disclosure injunction - Claimant failing to comply with order for directions - Claim being struck out - Claimant applying for re-instatement of claim - Whether relief should be granted - CPR 3.9, 15.5 - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 6, 8, 10.
Practice Civil Procedure Rules. The Queen's Bench Division, in dismissing the claimant's application for relief from strike out and re-instatement of the claim under CPR Pt3.9, held that there was no purpose to be served by granting relief.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases