| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 93 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 431 (QB) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judge: | Tugendhat J |
| Representation | Hugh Tomlinson QC (instructed by Schillings) for the claimant. |
| Richard Spearman QC & Jacob Dean (instructed by Simons Muirhead & Burton) for the first defendant. | |
| The second defendant did not appear and was not represented. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 2 March 2012 |
Catchwords
Practice - Civil Procedure Rules - Striking out - Claimant bringing claim for damages and permanent non-disclosure injunction - Claimant failing to comply with order for directions - Claim being struck out - Claimant applying for re-instatement of claim - Whether relief should be granted - CPR 3.9, 15.5 - European Convention on Human Rights, arts 6, 8, 10.
The Case
Practice Civil Procedure Rules. The Queen's Bench Division, in dismissing the claimant's application for relief from strike out and re-instatement of the claim under CPR Pt3.9, held that there was no purpose to be served by granting relief.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
