| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 180 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 570 (Ch) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Vos J |
| Representation | Michael Tennet QC and James McCreath (instructed by Burges Salmon LLP) for the claimants. |
| Keith Rowley QC and Elizabeth Ovey (instructed by Allen & Overy LLP) for the first defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 14 March 2012 |
Catchwords
Pension - Pension scheme - Company pension scheme - Claimant trustees joining first defendant company's pension scheme - Dispute arising as to correct method for calculating living expenses in certain circumstances - Whether more appropriate to use Index of Consumer Prices or Index of Retail Prices to make calculation - Whether second defendant, P, to be appointed to represent certain members of scheme - Pensions Act 1967, s 67 - CPR 19.7(2).
The Case
Pension Pension scheme. The Chancery Division held, inter alia, that on the true construction of terms between the parties, it would be possible for the trustees in a pension scheme to use a different cost of living index for different purposes under the scheme.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
