| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 121 (Jun) |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Lord Neuberger MR, Moses and Rimer LJJ (judgment delivered extempore) |
| Representation | Stephen Glynn (instructed by Simpkins & Co, Christchurch, Dorset) for the claimant. |
| Marcus Dignum (instructed by Morris Orman Hearle, Cheltenham) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 19 June 2012 |
Catchwords
Road traffic - Accident - Negligence - Vehicle collision - Claimant's motorcycle colliding with defendant's car - Claimant claiming defendant crossing middle of road - Defendant maintaining claimant crossing middle of road - Judge finding most likely that claimant crossing middle of road - Whether judge erring.
The Case
Road traffic Accident. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, upheld a finding that a road traffic collision had, on the balance of probabilities, been likely to have been caused by the claimant crossing the middle of the road into the path of the defendant rather than vice-versa.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
