| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 97 (Jun) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 1629 (Admin) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London) |
| Judge: | Eady J |
| Representation | Richard Drabble QC and Christian Howells (instructed by N C Brothers & Co) for the claimants. |
| Simon Pritchard (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 15 June 2012 |
Catchwords
Immigration - Leave to remain - Indefinite leave to remain - Claimants being children of former Gurkha soldiers - Claimants applying for indefinite leave to remain in United Kingdom as dependants of their parents - Defendant Secretary of State rejecting applications - Claimants applying for judicial review - Whether Secretary of State's policy unlawful - Whether Secretary of State's decision flawed.
The Case
Immigration Leave to remain. The Administrative Court dismissed the applications for judicial review by the Gurkha children claimants of the defendant Secretary of State's decision to reject their applications for indefinite leave to remain in the United Kingdom.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

