| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 07 (Jun) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWCA Civ 741 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Lord Neuberger MR, Hallett and Stanley Burnton LJJ |
| Representation | Zane Malik (instructed by Malik Law Chambers) for the claimants. |
| Thomas Roe (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 1 June 2012 |
Catchwords
Immigration - Leave to remain - Appeal - Claimants application for extension of leave to remain being refused - Claimants appealing - Whether Secretary of State required to consider making removal direction at same time or shortly after decision to refuse extension of leave to remain - .
The Case
Immigration Leave to remain. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the claimants' appeal against a refusal to extend their leave to remain in the UK, held that the Secretary of State was not obliged to consider whether or not to make a removal direction at the same time as, or very shortly after, a decision to refuse an application for further leave to remain.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
