| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 62 (Jun) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 1594 (Ch) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | William Trower QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court |
| Representation | Katherine Holland QC (instructed by Taylor Wessing LLP) for the claimants. |
| Michael Barnes QC (instructed by Nabarro LLP) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 13 June 2012 |
Catchwords
Easement - Light - Interference with light - Remedies - Claimants owning commercial premises - Defendant owning adjacent commercial premises - Claimants alleging having right to easement of light and right obstructed by defendant's property - Claimants seeking declaration that entitled to easement or easements of light pursuant to relevant statutory provision - Whether claimants entitled to declaration - .
The Case
Easement Light. The Chancery Division held that, on the true construction of a clause in a conveyance between the previous owners of two properties, the claimants were not entitled, pursuant to the to an easement or easements of light with respect to windows of their property.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
