||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 60 (Jul)
|| EWHC 2128 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Simon J (judgment delivered extempore)
||Peter Caldwell and Malcolm Hawkes (instructed by Edward Bayes solicitors) for the appellants.
||Gemma Lindfield (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the judicial authority.
||4 July 2012
Extradition - Hearing - Extradition offence - European arrest warrant - Appellants subject to warrants to face charges of drug trafficking in France - Offences taking place in France and United Kingdom - Whether UK natural forum for prosecution - Whether extradition contrary to appellants' rights - European Convention on Human Rights, art 8.
Extradition Hearing. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the appellants' appeal against extradition to France to face allegations of drug trafficking, held that the appellants' prosecution in France would not be perverse and they had not come anywhere near to establishing that such an extradition would infringe upon their rights under art8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases