| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 166 (Mar) |
| Court: | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
| Judge: | Judge Clark, Mr D Bleiman and Mr P Gammon |
| Representation | James Petts (instructed by Astons Solicitors, Staverton) for the employee. |
| Jonathan Buckle (instructed by The A P Partnership Ltd, Peterborough) for the employer. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 18 January 2012 |
Catchwords
Employment - Discrimination - Age discrimination - Employer making remarks concerning age during and after employee's employment - Employee bringing claim of age discrimination - Employment tribunal finding that prima facie case of age discrimination not being made out - Employee appealing - Whether prima facie case of age discrimination made out.
The Case
Employment Discrimination. The Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the employee's appeal against the employment tribunal's findings in respect of contributory conduct and age discrimination.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
