Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2012] All ER (D) 193 (Jan)
Neutral Citation: [2012] EWCA Civ 38
Court: Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Judge: Maurice Kay VP, Hughes and McFarlane LJJ
Representation The wife appeared in person.
  The husband appeared in person.
Judgment Dates: 26 January 2012

Catchwords

Practice - Ancillary relief - Appeal - Parties agreeing consent order following agreement on ancillary relief - Claimant wife subsequently suspecting defendant husband not making full disclosure of assets - Court conducting re-evaluation exercise - Husband being ordered to make further lump sum payment - Husband appealing - Whether judge erring.

The Case

Practice Ancillary relief. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the defendant husband's appeal against a lump sum payment ordered to the claimant wife subsequent to an ancillary relief order, on the ground that, in the circumstances, the judge had not erred in his calculation of the amount due.

Practice Areas

View Digest What is the Digest

The judgment for this case is forthcoming.

What is the full transcript

Lexis®Library

  • An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
  • Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
  • The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
  • Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases