Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2012] All ER (D) 123 (Jan)
Neutral Citation: [2012] EWHC 68 (Admin)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Judge: Lang J
Representation The claimant appeared in person.
  Sarah Hannett (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
  The authority did not appear and was not represented.
Judgment Dates: 24 January 2012

Catchwords

Town and country planning - Permission for development - Refusal - Claimant being refused planning permission for for dormer window and roof extension - Decision being upheld by planning inspector - Whether inspector's decision irrational - Whether inspector making mistake of fact - .

The Case

Town and country planning Permission for development. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the claimant's application pursuant to s288 of the held that the court was unable to interfere with the inspector's exercise of planning judgment, nor had the claimant established that the inspector had made a mistake of fact or that there had been any unfairness.

Practice Areas

View Digest What is the Digest

The judgment for this case is forthcoming.

What is the full transcript

Lexis®Library

  • An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
  • The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
  • Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
  • Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases