| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 60 (May) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 396 (TCC) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court |
| Judge: | Ramsey J |
| Representation | Fiona Parkin QC and Omar Eljadi (instructed by Herbert Smith) for the claimant. |
| Stuart Catchpole QC (instructed by Pinsent Masons) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 27 February 2012 |
Catchwords
Costs - Wasted costs - Deficient disclosure - Court making orders for disclosure and costs - Claimant company making deficient disclosure - Defendant company seeking wasted costs - Whether claimant failing to make proper disclosure - Whether court should vary costs order - Whether defendant being entitled to costs of application for further disclosure - Whether defendant being entitled to wasted costs - CPR 3.1(7), 44.3.
The Case
Costs Wasted costs. The Technology and Construction Court ordered that the claimant pay part of the defendant's wasted costs due to its deficient disclosure, in a dispute arising from the construction of the West African Gas Pipeline.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
