| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 37 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 397 (Ch) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Vos J |
| Representation | Jeremey Reed (instructed by Lee & Thompson) for the claimants. |
| Michael Silverleaf QC, Anthony Hudson and Guy Vassall-Adams (instructed by Olswang LLP) for the first defendant. | |
| Gavin Millar QC and Alexandra Marzec (instructed by Payne Hicks Beach) for the second defendant. | |
| Jason Beer QC for the Metropolitan Police Service. | |
| David Glen for the applicant. | |
| Andrew Edis QC for the Crown Prosecution Service. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 27 February 2012 |
Catchwords
Practice - Pre-trial or post-judgment relief - Disclosure of documents - Orders being made in phone hacking case limiting disclosure of court documents - Application being made for disclosure of certain documents - Whether disclosure should be granted - CPR 5.4
The Case
Practice Pre-trial or post-judgment relief. The Chancery Division decided that pursuant to CPR 5.4C the documents sought by the applicant, in relation to the phone 'hacking' scandal were to be made available in their unredacted form
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
