||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 75 (Feb)
|| EWCA Crim 134
||Court of Appeal, Criminal Division
Moses LJ, Keith J and Judge Scott-Gall
||James Stone (instructed by MPR Solicitors) for the defendant.
||Richard Merz (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the Crown.
||9 February 2012
Criminal Evidence - Prejudice to accused - Rape - Defendant charged with Rape of 16 year old Complainant - Jury permitted to consider transcripts of complainant's ABE interview during deliberations - Defendant convicted - Whether conviction unsafe.
Criminal Evidence Prejudice to accused. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division allowed an appeal against conviction for rape where a judge had wrongly permitted a jury to consider transcript of a complaint's ABE interview during their deliberation.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases