| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 21 (Feb) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London) |
| Judge: | Moses LJ and Irwin J (judgment delivered extempore) |
| Representation | Pamela Rose (instructed by Cooper & Co) for the claimant. |
| James Boyd (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 3 February 2012 |
Catchwords
Animal - Dog - Dangerous dog - Claimant charged with being owner of dangerous dog - Order being made for destruction of dog - Claimant appealing - Dog subsequently being taken into care of animal sanctuary - Claimant's appeal being refused - Whether court having power to order dog to remain in sanctuary.
The Case
Animal Dog. The Administrative Court, in allowing the claimant's application for judicial review, held that the crown court had had the power to make a contingent destruction order in respect of a dog.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
