Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2012] All ER (D) 122 (Feb)
Neutral Citation: [2012] EWHC 273 (Comm)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
Judge:

Cooke J

Representation Mark Jones (instructed by Marine Law Solicitors Ltd) for the claimant.
  Paul Henton (instructed by Reed Smith LLP) for the defendant.
Judgment Dates: 17 February 2012

Catchwords

Contract - Duress - Economic duress - Claimant owners of vessel entering charter with defendant charterers - Owners subsequently chartering same vessel to third party - Owners confirming would find alternative vessel and would compensate for damages - Charterers requesting $USD6 discount per metric ton of cargo in relation to reduced purchase price demanded by buyers as result of delay in shipment - Owners refusing and offering $USD2 per metric ton (offer) - Charterers accepting $USD2 discount but reserving rights regarding claims for damages arising out of breach of charter - Owners requiring acceptance of offer together with agreement to waive claims for loss and damage - Charterers stating forced to accept terms under protest (settlement agreement) - Arbitrators finding agreement procured by economic duress - Settlement agreement accordingly voidable - Owners appealing on basis facts found by arbitrators not amounting to 'illegitimate pressure' required to establish duress - Whether arbitrators applying wrong test in law.

The Case

Contract Duress. The Queens' Bench Division (Commercial Court): In dismissing an appeal against a finding by arbitrators that the conduct of the owners of a vessel had amounted to the 'illegitimate pressure' required to establish duress in law, it was held that the arbitrators had applied the correct test in law in analysing the facts.

Practice Areas

If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.