||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 164 (Feb)
|| EWHC 358 (Admin)
||Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court
Hooper LJ and Singh J
||Clare Montgomery QC and Mark Summers (instructed by Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP) for the claimants on grounds 1-3.
||Hugo Keith QC and Mark Summers (instructed by Peters & Peters Solicitors LLP) for the claimants on ground 4.
||Aaron Watkins (instructed by the Crown Prosecution Service) for the judicial authority.
||23 February 2012
Extradition - Extradition hearing - European arrest warrant - Defendant judicial authority seeking extradition of claimants - Judge ordering claimants extradition - Claimants appealing - Whether European arrest warrant capable of being issued prior to prosecution being commenced - Whether warrants valid - .
Extradition Extradition hearing. The Divisional Court, in dismissing the claimants' appeals against extradition, held, inter alia, that the European arrest warrants had complied with s2(3) of the and that the extradition of the claimants would not breach their human rights under art 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases