| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 121 (Feb) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 290 (QB) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division |
| Judge: | Eady J |
| Representation | The claimant appeared in person. |
| Clare Kissin (instructed by Kennedys) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 20 February 2012 |
Catchwords
Practice - Striking out - Abuse of process - Claimant student being denied right to suspend university course on basis of false information - Claimant bringing claim in defamation - Defendant university applying to strike out claim - Whether claim should be struck out.
The Case
Practice Striking out. The Queen's Bench Division held that the claimant's case in defamation would be struck out on the basis, inter alia, that no reasonable person would nowadays think any the worse of someone who had suffered from either 'mental health difficulties' or from 'chronic fatigue syndrome and anxiety'.
Practice Areas
What is the full transcript?
An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers.LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and above.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

