Source: All England Reporter
Publisher Citation: [2012] All ER (D) 15 (Feb)
Court: Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London)
Judge: Ouseley J (judgment delivered extempore)
Representation Matthew Reed (instructed by the Hertfordshire County Council Legal Services Department) for the authority.
  Daniel Kolinsky (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.
  Anthony Dinkin QC and Clare Parry (instructed by Mullis & Peake, Romford) for the second respondent.
Judgment Dates: 1 February 2012

Catchwords

Town and country planning - Enforcement Notice - Appeal against notice - Appellant local authority issuing two enforcement notices against second respondent company - Second respondent challenging enforcement notices - Inspector appointed by first respondent Secretary of State quashing enforcement notices - Authority appealing - Whether inspector erring - Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, .

The Case

Town and country planning Enforcement Notice. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the local authority's appeal under s289 of the held that the inspector appointed by the first respondent Secretary of State had not erred in her approach when she decided to quash two enforcement notices issued by the authority against the second respondent.

Practice Areas

View Digest What is the Digest

The judgment for this case is forthcoming.

What is the full transcript

Lexis®Library

  • Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
  • The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
  • Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases