| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 23 (May) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 1039 (TCC) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court |
| Judge: | Akenhead J |
| Representation | Mark Raeside QC (instructed by Prettys) for the claimant. |
| Fionnuala McCredie (instructed by Freeth Cartwright LLP) for the defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 24 April 2012 |
Catchwords
Building contract - Adjudication - Jurisdiction of adjudicator - Claimant submitting interim application for payment - Defendant company asserting lesser amount due - Claimant issuing notice of adjudication - Defendant asserting adjudicator not having jurisdiction - Adjudicator finding in favour of the claimant - Claimant bringing claim and applying for summary judgment - Whether a crystallised dispute in existence at relevant time.
The Case
Building contract Adjudication. The Technology and Construction Court held that the claimant was entitled to judgment for 229,771 plus VAT, being the amount of the claim that the adjudicator had jurisdiction to adjudicate upon.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
