| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 77 (Apr) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] EWHC 977 (Admin) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Lindblom J |
| Representation | Gregory Jones QC and Richard Honey (instructed by Dickinson Dees LLP) for the claimant. |
| Rhodri Price Lewis QC (instructed by Legal Services Department, Basingstoke and Dean Borough Council) for the authority. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 17 April 2012 |
Catchwords
Judicial review - Application for judicial review - Application for permission to apply for judicial review - Defendant local planning authority being landowner of site - Authority refusing to identify site for development for purposes of core strategy - Claimant seeking judicial review of decisions - Whether claim excluded from court's jurisdiction - .
The Case
Judicial review Application for judicial review. The Administrative Court allowed the claimant's application for judicial review of the defendant local planning authority's decisions that a site should not be identified for development for the purposes of its core strategy and held that the claim was not excluded from the court's jurisdiction in a claim for judicial review by s113 of the and that the decisions had been unlawful.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
