||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 130 (Apr)
|| EWHC 1067 (Comm)
||Queen's Bench Division, Commercial Court
Andrew Smith J
||Mark Hapgood QC and Alexander Pelling (instructed by Berwin Leighton Paisner LLP) for the claimants.
||Iain Milligan and Michael Collett (instructed by Sidley Austin LLP) for the defendant.
||25 April 2012
Arbitration - Stay of court proceedings - Arbitration agreement - Parties entering arbitration agreement - Claimant companies commencing proceedings for declaration arbitration agreement inoperative - Defendant company seeking stay of proceedings - Whether proceedings 'in respect of' referred matter - Whether arguable that arbitration agreement operative - .
Arbitration Stay of court proceedings. The Commercial Court, under of the Arbitration Act 1996, stayed the claimants' application for declarations that an arbitration agreement included in an agreement between the parties in relation to the financing of train vehicles was inoperative.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases