| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 63 (May) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Peter Leaver QC sitting as a deputy judge of the High Court |
| Representation | David Chivers QC and Michael Patchett-Joyce (instructed by The Khan Partnership) for the claimant. |
| Philip Moser QC (instructed by the Solicitor for the Revenue and Customs Commissioners) for the Revenue. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 27 April 2012 |
Catchwords
Set-off - Assignment of debt - Taxation - Claimant being assigned company's benefit of appeal against disallowance of VAT input tax - First-tier Tribunal awarding claimant VAT input tax - Respondent Revenue and Customs Commissioners seeking to set-off award against tax owing by company - Claimant submitting no right to set-off - Claimant submitting legitimate expectation award not being set-off - Claimant seeking interest on award - Whether Revenue being entitled to set-off - Whether claimant having legitimate expectation award not being set-off - Whether claimant being entitled to interest - Tribunal, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, - Finance Act 2008, ss 130, 133.
The Case
Set-off Assignment of debt. The Chancery Division held that the respondent Revenue and Customs Commissioners were not permitted to set-off the sum owed by a company in respect of corporation tax and PAYE against the claimant's right as assignee to repayment of VAT input tax.
Practice Areas
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

