| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2012] All ER (D) 148 (Apr) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2012] Lexis Citation 30 |
| Court: | European Court of Human Rights |
| Judge: | Judge Garlicki (President), Judges Björgvinsson, Bratza, Hirvelä, Nicolaou, Bianku, Vucinic and L Early (Section Registrar) |
| Judgment Dates: | 10 April 2012 |
Catchwords
Human rights - Inhuman or degrading treatment - Extradition - Applicants being accused of terrorist offences by United States government - Secretary of State ordering extradition of applicants to USA - Applicants contending detention conditions and length of possible sentences in US amounting to ill-treatment - Whether applicants' rights would be violated - European Convention on Human Rights, art 3.
The Case
Human rights Inhuman or degrading treatment. The European Court of Human Rights held that there would be no violation of art3 of the European Convention on Human Rights as a result of the conditions of detention at a certain prison and the length of the sentences the applicants faced, if convicted, were they were extradited to the United States of America.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases

