||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 232 (Oct)
|| EWCA Civ 1236
||Court of Appeal, Civil Division
Mummery, Hooper and McFarlane LJJ
||Gregory Jones QC and Rebecca Clutten (instructed by Balsara & Co) for the claimant.
||Sam Grodzinski QC (instructed by EJ Winter & Son) for the Adjudicator.
||27 October 2011
Education - Special educational needs - Educational provision - Disability discrimination - Claimant suffering from narcolepsy - Claimant being unable to maintain University course - Claimant making complaint - University apologising - Claimant making complaint to Office of the Independent Adjudicator for Higher Education alleging disability discrimination - Adjudicator upholding complaint but making no explicit statement on disability discrimination - Claimant applying for judicial review - Application being refused - Claimant appealing.
Education Special educational needs. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the claimant's appeal of the High Court's refusal to quash a Final Decision of the Office of the Independent Adjudicator of Higher Education that did not make a positive finding of disability discrimination in her complaint against her University, held that the OIA was not under an obligation to adjudicate issues such as whether or not there had been disability discrimination.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases