A
- A City Council v T and others
- A County Council v A mother and others
- A Local Authority v K and others
- A Nelson & Co Ltd and another company v Guna SPA
- Abbott v Long
- Abernethy v Hotbed Ltd
- AES Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant LLC v Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC
- AF (Father) v T (Mother) and another
- Aitken v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- Amos v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Theophilus v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Andrew v Eden College
- AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Arash Shipping Enterprises Company Ltd v Groupama Transport
- Attorney General's Reference (No 15 of 2011) R v Scott
- Attorney General's Reference (No 17 of 2011)
- Avon Estates Ltd v Welsh Ministers and another
B
- Bacon v Automattic Inc and others
- Baghishyan v District Court in Zamusc, Poland
- Bailey v R & R Plant (Peterborough) Ltd
- Ballesteros v Nursing & Midwifery Council
- Barker v Hambleton District Council
- Barnard v Director of Public Prosecutions
- Barnes and another v Black Horse Ltd
- Barrett v Bem and others
- Bartlett and others v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
- BDW Trading Ltd (trading as Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd
- Belgian Judicial Authority v O'Sullivan
- Belka v Prosperini
- Berent v Family Mosaic Housing and another
- Berezovsky v Abramovich
- Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG), Anstalt des Offentlichen Rechts v JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
- Best Buy Co Inc and another v Worldwide Sales Corporation Espana SL
- Blue Sky One Ltd and others v Mahan Air and another; PK Airfinance US Inc v Blue Sky Two Ltd and others
- Boismard v District Court in Lublin, Poland
- Booth v Garside and Laycock Ltd
- Bouzir v Country Style Foods Ltd
- Briars v Williamson & Soden Solicitors
- Brodka v Military District Court in Warsaw, Poland
- Bull v Oxford City Council
C
- Carboex SA v Louis Dreyfus Commodities Suisse SA
- CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- CheapFlights International Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
- Ciesielski v District Court in Kalisz, Poland
- Clynes v O'Connor
- Connery v PHS Group Ltd
- Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd
- Crown Aluminium Ltd v Northern & Western Insurance Company Ltd and another
- CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another
- CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another
- CTB v News Group Newspapers Ltd and another
D
- Dabson v David Cover & Sons Ltd
- Delphi Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Dusseldorf
- DL v Newham London Borough Council
- DM V Secretary of State for Justice
- DSG International Sourcing Ltd and another company v Universal Media Corporation (Slovakia) SRO
- Dziuzas v District Court of Moletai Region, Lithuania
E
- Eaton Mansions (Westminster) Ltd v Stinger Compania de Inversion SA
- Ebden v News International Ltd
- EG v United Kingdom
- European Commission v Austria
- European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany
- European Commission v Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
- European Commission v Portugese Republic
- European Communities v Region de Bruxelles-Capitale
- Exeter City Council v Sandle
F
- FA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Farag v General Medical Council
- Ferguson v Nursing and Midwifery Council
- Franbar Holdings Ltd v Casualty Plus Ltd
- Fraser v Her Majesty's Advocate
- Furmedge and others v Chester-Le-Street District Council
G
- Gladhurst Properties Ltd v Hashemi (on behalf of himself and Matthew Johnson)
- Glenton Espana, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (The Polo/Lauren Company, LP intervening)
- Godfrey Morgan Solicitors Ltd v Cobalt Systems Ltd
- Golab v Regional Court in Elblag, Poland
- Goodwin v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- Grand v Gill
- Grasser v Freistaat Bayern
- Group Lotus plc and another v 1Malaysia Racing Team SDN BHD and others
- Grudzinski v District Court of Czestochowa, Poland
- Gryncewicz v Polish Judicial Authority
H
- H (children)(sexual abuse: fact-finding)
- Hackett v Crown Prosecution Service and another
- Harmatos v Office of the Kings Prosecutor in Dendermonde, Belgium
- Harry Yearsley Ltd v Secretary of State for Justice
- Hassan v Secretary of State for Justice
- Hauptzollamt Koblenz v Kurt Etling und Thomas Etling in GbR
- Hawke v Director of Public Prosecutions
- Helden v Strathmore Ltd
- Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd and others
- Hess Corporation v Stena Drillmax III Ltd and another company
- Hosny v General Medical Council
- Hulme v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another
- Humber Oil Terminals Trustee Ltd v Associated British Ports
I
- Iaia and others v Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Universita e della Ricerca and others
- IIC – Intersport International Corp GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)(OHIM)
- Iwinski v Regional Court in Bydgoszcz, Poland
J
- James v Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals
- Jean Christian Perfumes Ltd and another v Thakrar (trading as Brand Distributor and/or Brand Distributors Ltd alternatively sued on his own account)
- Johnson v Fourie
- JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov and others
- JSC BTA Bank v Solodchenko and others
K
- K v L
- Kahlon v Isherwood
- Kennedy v Information Commissioner and another
- Khan v Malik and another
- Khatib v Ramco International and others
- Kingfisher Builders v Sear
- Kudjodji v Lidl Ltd
- Kurt v City Index Ltd
L
M
- Mabiriizi v HSBC Insurance (UK) Ltd
- Magritz v Public Prosecutors Office in Bremen, Germany
- Marathon Restaurant v London Borough of Camden
- Martin v Computers in the City Ltd
- Masri v Consolidated Contractors International SAL and others
- McCarthy v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Mekarska v Ruiz and another
- Millburn-Snell and others v Evans
- MJN v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- MMP GMBH Network (formerly Antal International GMBH) v Antal International Network Ltd
- Morris v Davies and others
- Mosley v United Kingdom
- MS v Lincolnshire County Council
- MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH v Merckle GmbH
- Musikyavichius v Government of the Russian Federation
N
- Naseem (trading as SH Builders and Contractors) v Kang
- Nassery v Brent London Borough Council
- Novo Nordisk AS v Ravimiamet
O
- Olymp Bezner GmbH & Co KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
- Omega Engineering Incorporated v Omega SA
- OOO and others v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
P
- Packham (trading as Bathroom Specialist) v Sykes and another
- Parker Rhodes Hickmotts Solicitors v Legal Services Commission
- Perry v Serious Organised Crime Agency
- Phoenix Property Investors Ltd v Grange Securities Ltd
- Potts v Densley and another
- Prosecution Appeal; R v Taylor
- Prunus SARL and another v Polonium SA
- Publicis Consultants UK Ltd v O'Farrell
R
- R (on the application of A) v Lewisham Youth Court
- R (on the application of Adams)(FC) v Secretary of State for Justice Re MacDermott and another appeal
- R (on the application of Adebesi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Ahmed) v National Probation Service and another
- R (on the application of Arshad) v Southwark Crown Court
- R (on the application of Atapattu) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Bashir) v Independant Adjudicator
- R (on the application of Bingham) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court
- R (on the application of Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Bryant and others) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis
- R (on the application of Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police) v Salford Magistrates' Court
- R (on the application of D) v Independent Police Complaints Commission
- R (on the application of Davis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Evans) v Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
- R (on the application of Francis) v Secretary of State for Justice and another
- R (on the application of GC) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner R (on the application of C) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
- R (on the application of Golding) v Income Tax Commissioners
- R (on the application of Government of the United States of America) v De Greef
- R (on the application of Gray) v Crown Court Aylesbury
- R (on the application of HH) v City of Westminster Magistrates Court; HH v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa; PH v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa;
- R (on the application of HRH Sultan of Pahang) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Kambadzi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Mjemer) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Nab) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Peat and others) v Hyndburn Borough Council
- R (on the application of Singh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of TG) v Lambeth London Borough Council
- R (on the application of W) v Birmingham City Council
- R (on the application of Walker) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
- R (on the application of Williams) v Police Medical Appeal Board
- R and another v A
- R v Ali and others
- R v Bajwa and others
- R v Bhanji
- R v Bond
- R v Brown
- R v Cotswold Geotechnical (Holdings) Ltd
- R v D
- R v D and other appeals
- R v Davies
- R v Davis
- R v Dizaei
- R v Dobson
- R v Eve
- R v George and others
- R v Guthrie and others
- R v Hull
- R v M
- R v Nicholas and another
- R v Raynham
- R v Redmond
- R v Reece
- R v Sammon
- R v Smith
- R v Twist and others
- R v W
- R v Wallace
- R v Yohannes
- R v Young
- R v Zejmowicz and another
- Rana v Manan
- Re Broadside Colours and Chemicals Ltd Brown and another v Button and others
- Re C (a child) (direct contact: suspension)
- Re Foster
- Re H (a child) (abuse: oral evidence)
- Re McCaughey and another
- Re Mumtaz Properties Ltd; Wetton (as liquidator of Mumtaz Properties Ltd) v Ahmed and others
- Re Pennell
- Re Rodenstock GmbH
- Re Rowellian Football Social Club
- Re Sankey
- Re Stealth Construction Ltd
- Re X, Y and Z (children)(anonymity: identity of expert)
- Renwick and another v Simon and Michael Brooke Architects and other companies
- Rice v Health Professions Council
- Romer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg
- Ryanair Ltd v European Commission
S
- Sagala v Circuit Court in Swindica, Poland
- Saverymuttu v General Medical Council
- Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills v Chohan and others
- Serious Organised Crime Agency v Sahota
- Sitek v Circuit Court in Swidnica, Poland
- Skrzypczak v Circuit Court in Poznan, Poland
- Smith v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- South Wales Fire and Rescue Service v Smith
- Stena Line Ltd v Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund Trustees Ltd and another
- Stokes v Mardner
- Summers v Havard
- Systemcare (UK) Ltd v Services Design Technology Ltd and another
T
- Tafa v Matsim Properties Ltd and others
- Thames Valley Housing Association Ltd and another v Elegant (Guernsey) Ltd and others and another and Macpherson (part 20 defendant)
- Tinseltime Ltd v Roberts and others
- TMT Asia Ltd v Marine Trade SA
- Tower MCashback LLP and another v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
- Trzonek v Circuit Court 2nd Olsztyn Poland
- TSE and another v News Group Newspapers Ltd
- TTMI Sarl v Statoil ASA
- Turek v Regional Court in Gliwice, Poland
- Turek v Regional Court in Gliwice, Poland
- Tworkowski v Judicial Authority of Poland
U
V
W
- W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others
- Wandsworth Borough Council v Covent Garden Market Authority
- Wardle v Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank
- Whaley v Whaley
- Withers LLP v Rybak and others
- Wright v Deccan Chargers Sporting Ventures Ltd and another
