|Source:||All England Reporter|
|Publisher Citation:|| All ER (D) 352 (Mar)|
|Neutral Citation:|| EWHC 729 (Ch)|
|Representation||John McGhee QC (instructed by Dundas & Wilson LLP) for the claimant.|
|Timothy Fancourt QC and Oliver Radley-Gardner (instructed by Norton Rose LLP) for the defendant.|
|Judgment Dates:||31 March 2011|
Contract - Construction - Contractual term - Parties entering into contract for sub-sub-underlease of premises let by claimant company from third party - Parties intending clause in sub-sub-underlease to state rent payable by defendant after certain specified date - Relevant clause on its bare wording leading to defendant paying less rent than anticipated by claimant - Proper construction of clause - Meaning of relevant words - Whether relevant clause should be read as achieving effect contended for by claimant.