| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2011] All ER (D) 280 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2011] EWHC 310 (Admin) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court |
| Judge: | Ouseley J |
| Representation | Ian Stern QC (instructed by the Association of Optometrists) for the appellant. |
| David Bradley (instructed by the General Optical Council) for the respondent. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 24 March 2011 |
Catchwords
Medical practitioner - General Optical Council - Fitness to practice panel - Appeal - Whether claimant guilty of misconduct and defective professional performance.
The Case
Medical practitioner General Optical Council. The Administrative Court of the Queen's Bench Division allowed the appellant's appeal against the respondent committee's decision that she was guilty of misconduct and defective professional performance, where the committee had failed to address important factual issues in the case.
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
