| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2011] All ER (D) 305 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2011] EWCA Civ 334 |
| Court: | Court of Appeal, Civil Division |
| Judge: | Sir Andrew Morritt C, Toulson and Sullivan LJJ |
| Representation | Richard Harwood and Andrew Deakin (instructed by Richard Buxton Solicitors) for the claimant. |
| James Maurici (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 25 March 2011 |
Catchwords
Planning - Environment - Projects likely to significantly affect environment - Demolition - Development consent - Council Directive (EC) 85/337 - Town and Country Planning (Demolition - Description of Buildings) Direction 1995.
The Case
Planning Environment. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, held that demolition works were capable of being a 'scheme' for the purposes of art1.2 of Council Directive (EC) 85-337.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
