| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2011] All ER (D) 174 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2011] EWHC 594 (Ch) |
| Court: | Chancery Division |
| Judge: | Briggs J |
| Representation | Hugo Page QC and Tom Hickman (instructed by Merriman White) for the claimants. |
| Sharif a Shivji (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna LLP) for the first defendant. | |
| Jonathan Crow QC and Christopher Harrison (instructed by Hogan Lovells International LLP) for the second defendant. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 16 March 2011 |
Catchwords
Practice - Pre-trial or post-judgment relief - Application to amend particulars of claim - Claimants applying for permission to amend particulars of claim following handing down of judgment on basis of further evidence served after conclusion of hearing - Whether amendment should be allowed.
The Case
Practice Pre-trial or post-judgment relief. The Chancery Division dismissed the claimant's application to amend their particulars of claim, following the striking out of their case, as disclosing no real prospect of success.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
