||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 174 (Mar)
|| EWHC 594 (Ch)
||Hugo Page QC and Tom Hickman (instructed by Merriman White) for the claimants.
||Sharif a Shivji (instructed by CMS Cameron McKenna LLP) for the first defendant.
||Jonathan Crow QC and Christopher Harrison (instructed by Hogan Lovells International LLP) for the second defendant.
||16 March 2011
Practice - Pre-trial or post-judgment relief - Application to amend particulars of claim - Claimants applying for permission to amend particulars of claim following handing down of judgment on basis of further evidence served after conclusion of hearing - Whether amendment should be allowed.
Practice Pre-trial or post-judgment relief. The Chancery Division dismissed the claimant's application to amend their particulars of claim, following the striking out of their case, as disclosing no real prospect of success.
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases