| Source: | All England Reporter |
| Publisher Citation: | [2011] All ER (D) 214 (Mar) |
| Neutral Citation: | [2011] EWHC 637 (Admin) |
| Court: | Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court (London) |
| Judge: | Supperstone J |
| Representation | Nathalie Lieven QC and Richard Turney (instructed by Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP) for the claimants. |
| Eleanor Grey (instructed by the Department of Health) for the defendants. | |
| Judgment Dates: | 18 March 2011 |
Catchwords
Costs - Order for costs - Costs of appeal - Claimant's appeal being dismissed - Claimant contending appropriate order should be no order as to costs - Whether defendant entitled to costs of litigation.
The Case
Costs Order for costs. The Administrative Court held that although the unsuccessful claimant was a charitable body, the successful defendant was entitled to its costs of litigation, such costs to be subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Practice Areas
If you are a LexisLibrary subscriber you can read more about this case here.
Lexis®Library
- An Official transcript is the final version of the judgment prepared by shorthand writers. LexisLibrary contains all judgments from the High Court and aboveView Judgment
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases
