||All England Reporter
|| All ER (D) 113 (Mar)
Briggs J (judgment delivered extempore)
||Justin Althaus (instructed by Chambers & Co) for the claimant.
||The defendant appeared in person.
||10 March 2011
Injunction - Balance of convenience - Interlocutory injunction - Parties in franchise agreement falling into dispute over effect of restrictive covenant - Claimant seeking interim injunction preventing defendant from operating in breach of restrictive covenant - Whether balance of convenience in favour of granting injunction.
Injunction Balance of convenience. The Chancery Division found that in the case of a dispute regarding the validity and effect of a restrictive covenant in a franchise agreement, the balance of convenience fell in favour of granting the claimant an interim injunction preventing the defendant from acting in breach of the restrictive covenant.
- Commentary discussing this particular case from LexisLibrary's comprehensive range of titles including Butterworths, Halsbury's and TolleyView related commentary
- The All England Law Reports comprises judgments with headnotes and catchwords indicating the area of law and key issues of the case prepared by legally qualified editorsFind AllER Reports
- Cases related to this particular case that are related to, or discuss this caseView related cases